top of page

Plain language summary of the CARTITUDE-4 study of cilta-cel or standard care in people with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma

Updated: Nov 15, 2024





Disclosures

This summary was written by Julia Cope as a spec sample to demonstrate writing capabilities to prospective clients. It was developed using the Envision Pharma Group Plain Language Summaries of Publications Toolkit (CC BY 4.0). Neither the study sponsor nor the original authors of the full article were involved in preparing this summary.


What is the purpose of this summary?

The aim of this summary is to help people with multiple myeloma, their caregivers, and healthcare providers understand recent results from CARTITUDE-4, an ongoing clinical study comparing ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) with standard care treatment in people with multiple myeloma.

 

Based on results from CARTITUDE-4, cilta-cel was approved in the USA and Europe in April 2024 as a treatment for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have already received at least one line of treatment for their disease, including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and whose disease doesn’t respond to lenalidomide. This summary is intended to help you understand the clinical trial results that led to cilta-cel’s expanded approval.

Treatment approvals can vary by region, so check with your local healthcare provider for more information about cilta-cel approval in your area.  CARTITUDE-4 is still ongoing, so the final outcomes of the study may differ from the outcomes described in this summary.

Some helpful definitions

What is relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma?

Multiple myeloma is a cancer of the bone marrow that develops in plasma cells, a type of white blood cell. There are medicines available to treat multiple myeloma. However, most people will find that their cancer eventually comes back (relapsed disease), or worsens even while treatment is being received (refractory disease).

 

What is lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma?

Lenalidomide is an anti-cancer medicine that is commonly used to treat people with multiple myeloma. It works by activating the immune system to kill cancer cells. People with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma have cancer that doesn’t respond, or has stopped responding to, lenalidomide treatment. These people often have faster disease progression and a shorter life-expectancy than those who do respond to lenalidomide. Therefore, there is a need for new therapies to treat people with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.  

 

What is cilta-cel?

People with multiple myeloma accumulate the cancerous multiple myeloma cells in their bone

marrow. Multiple myeloma cells have a protein on their surface called B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). BCMA is found in higher amounts on multiple myeloma cells than on normal cells. Cilta-cel is a medicine that targets BCMA, made from a multiple myeloma patient’s own T-cells. To produce cilta-cel, T-cells are collected from the patient’s blood and genetically modified to make receptors, called chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), that recognize BCMA. T-cells with these new receptors are known as CAR-T cells. After being made, cilta-cel CAR-T cells are given back to the same patient in a single infusion, where they multiply and move throughout the body. Now, the cells that recognize BCMA can identify multiple myeloma cells and destroy them.  


What did this phase 3 study look at?

Phase 3 studies are conducted to compare the safety and ability of a new medicine to treat a particular disease compared with current standard care treatments that are already known to be effective. In CARTITUDE-4, researchers compared cilta-cel treatment with standard care in people with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. In an earlier clinical study called CARTITUDE-1, cilta-cel reduced signs of multiple myeloma in people with who had already received 3 or more different lines of therapy (treatment approaches) for their disease. To see if cilta-cel can safely and effectively treat multiple myeloma if it is used earlier in the treatment course, CARTITUDE-4 looked at outcomes in people who had received either 1, 2, or 3 lines of therapy for their cancer. Specifically, they wanted to know:

  • How long participants live without their cancer getting worse.

  • How many participants respond to treatment by showing fewer signs of disease.

  • How much participants respond to treatment.

  • What side effects participants experience during treatment. 

 

Who took part in the study?

CARTITUDE-4 was carried out at 81 clinics in 16 countries in Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia. Participants enrolled in CARTITUDE-4 sometime between July 2020 and November 2021.

CARTITUDE-4 enrolled 64 people from North America, 257 people from Europe, 52 people from Asia, and 46 people from Australia.

The 419 people enrolled:

  • had multiple myeloma that was getting worse,

  • had received either 1, 2, or 3 lines of therapy for their multiple myeloma.

  • were resistant to lenalidomide, and

  • had not received CAR-T therapy or any BCMA-directed treatment before.

Of the 419 people enrolled, 208 were randomly assigned to receive cilta-cel. All 208 of these people had their T-cells collected to receive cilta-cel, and 176 of them actually received cilta-cel. Of the 419 people enrolled, 211 people were randomly assigned to receive standard care treatment, of whom 208 actually received standard care.

The characteristics of the participants were similar in the 2 treatment groups.

Characteristics of participants in the Cilta-cel group (208 people) and standard care group (211 people). In the cilta-cel group the median age was 62 years and 56% were male. 33% had received 1 line of therapy before the study, 40% had received 2, and 27% had received 3. In the standard care group, the median age was 61 years and 59% were male. 32% had received 1 line of treatment before the study, 41% had received 2, and 27% had received 3.



















How was the study carried out?

CARTITUDE-4 participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group in a 1:1 ratio. This means that for each person assigned to the cilta-cel group, another person was assigned to the standard care group.

 

Participants assigned to the standard care group received their doctor’s choice of one of two known effective treatment combinations, either:

  • pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) in 21-day cycles, or

  • daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) in 28-day cycles.

They received treatment until:

  • their disease got worse,

  • they experienced unacceptable side effects from the treatment, or

  • they chose to leave CARTITUDE-4.

 

Participants assigned to the cilta-cel group had their T-cells collected using a process called leukapheresis. The T-cells were sent to a manufacturing center to be made into cilta-cel CAR-T cells. Participants received either DPd or PVd to keep their multiple myeloma under control until their CAR-T cells were ready. Starting 5-7 days before receiving cilta-cel, participants underwent lymphodepletion where chemotherapy infusions made space in their immune system for the CAR-T cells. On the day of CAR-T treatment, participants received their cilta-cel CAR-T cells in a single infusion. The median time that participants had to wait from having their T-cells collected until receiving their cilta-cel infusion was 79 days.

CARTITUDE-4 is still ongoing. The researchers continue to follow participants to check if their disease is worsening, and to see how long they live for. They estimate the study will end in June 2027.

 

All participants were monitored for side effects and had regular tests to check if their cancer was responding to treatment or worsening.


What were the results of the study?

When comparing cilta-cel to standard care, CARTITUDE-4 researchers were most interested in how long participants are able to live after receiving treatment without their cancer worsening.

Progression-free survival is a measure of how long participants live without their disease getting worse. It is the length of time from when a participant is assigned to a treatment group until a test shows that their disease has progressed (worsened), or they die. Median progression-free survival is the length of time for half of the participants in the group to experience disease progression.

Approximately 15.9 months after being assigned to a treatment group, the median progression-free survival for the cilta-cel group wasn’t reached yet, meaning that more than half the participants were still living without experiencing disease progression. The median progression-free survival for the standard care group was 11.8 months.

People in the cilta-cel group lived for longer without their cancer getting worse, compared with those in the standard care group.

After 1 year, 76% of participants in the cilta-cel group still showed no signs of disease worsening, compared with 49% in the standard care group.


Similar benefit in progression-free survival was seen when CARTITUDE-4 researchers looked at specific groups of participants, including those who:

  • had high-risk disease features,

  • had tumors in soft-tissue (outside the bones) at the start of the study,

  • were resistant to 3 lines of treatment, and those who

  • had received only 1 line of treatment before the study.

 

More people in the cilta-cel group showed a partial or better response to treatment, compared with those in the standard care group.

Participants had different types of tests done to check for signs of myeloma in their blood, urine, and bone marrow. Participants who responded to treatment had a decrease in myeloma signs after receiving cilta-cel or while receiving standard care. For people in the cilta-cel group, 85% showed a response to treatment compared with 67% of people in the standard care group.


A “stringent complete response” is the best treatment response possible, as it means no signs of myeloma can be seen in sensitive tests that can detect even small amounts of disease. In comparison, a “complete response” to treatment is when there are no signs of myeloma using standard tests, so some disease may still be present.

In the cilta-cel group, 58% of participants showed a stringent complete response, 15% a complete response,  8% a very good partial response, and 3% a partial response. In the standard care group, 15% showed a stringent complete response, 7% a complete response, 24% a very good partial response, and 22% a partial response.
More people in the cilta-cel group showed minimal residual disease negativity, compared with those in the standard care group.

Some participants had their bone marrow tested for myeloma cells to check for minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. MRD negativity is when no cancer cells can be detected in the bone marrow sample. More participants in the cilta-cel group than in the standard care group who had their bone marrow tested showed MRD negativity during the study. 


What side effects were seen during the study?

Researchers noted the most commonly experienced side effects from the start of treatment until either 16 weeks after receiving cilta-cel or 30 days after finishing standard care treatment.

Low neutrophils were seen in 90% of participants in the cilta-cel group and 85% in the standard care group. Low platelets were seen in 54% of participants in the cilta-cel group and 31% in the standard care group. Low red blood cells were seen in 54% of participants in the cilta-cel group and 26% in the standard care group. Low lymphocytes were seen in 22% of participants in the cilta-cel group and 14% in the standard care group.

They found that low levels of different types of blood cells were common in both the cilta-cel and standard care groups.


Low levels of blood cells can make people with multiple myeloma more susceptible to infection. This increased risk was seen during

CARTITUDE-4, where 62% of participants in the cilta-cel group and 71% of participants in the standard care group had an infection.


The other most common side effects experienced by people in the cilta-cel group were nausea, low immunoglobulin antibody levels in the blood, diarrhea, tiredness, and headaches.


Participants who received cilta-cel were watched closely for side effects known to occur with CAR-T treatment, including cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. These side effects can potentially be life-threatening, but in CARTITUDE-4, researchers were able to manage all cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity events with appropriate medical care. 

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common side effect of CAR-T cell therapy and other therapies that activate the immune system, causing the release of immune proteins called cytokines. Symptoms of CRS occur from a sudden release of higher-than-normal levels of cytokines into the bloodstream and can include fever, nausea, low blood pressure, and headaches.  76% of participants who received cilta-cel experienced CRS (136 out of 176 people).  CRS began around 8 days after receiving cilta-cel and lasted for around 3 days.  CRS was severe in 2 participants, whereas all other cases were mild or moderate.
Neurotoxicity is another common side effect of CAR-T therapy, occurring when treatment affects the nervous system (brain, spinal cord, and nerves). Symptoms related to neurotoxicity are mostly temporary and can include headaches, disorientation, trouble communicating, and seizures.  21% of participants who received cilta-cel had a neurotoxicity event (36 out of 176 people).  Neurotoxicity events were severe or very severe in 5 participants, and mild or moderate in 31 participants. No one in the study died from a neurotoxicity event.

What do the results of the study mean?

  • People in CARTITUDE-4 who received cilta-cel lived longer without their multiple myeloma worsening compared with those who received standard care.

  • People in CARTITUDE-4 who received cilta-cel had a higher overall response to treatment compared with those who received standard care.

  • Side effects related specifically to CAR-T cell therapy, such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, were manageable with appropriate medical care.

  • Cilta-cel has potential as a treatment option for people with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 1 line of treatment that either didn’t work or stopped working.

 

Who sponsored the study?

CARTITUDE-4 was sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

 

Where can I find more relevant information?

The original article ‘Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma’ was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (San-Miguel J et al, N Engl J Med. 2023;389:335-47).

You can read the full article here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2303379

 

The CARTITUDE-4 study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04181827. Learn more about the study here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04181827

Study start date: 12 June 2020

Estimated study end date: 30 June 2027

 

A review of important results from clinical trials with cilta-cel, including CARTITUDE-4, was published in Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (Jagannath et al, Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2024;24(5):339-50).

You can read the full review here: https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2352591

 



 
 
Zubiak medical communications, freelance medical writing services.

Transforming complex data into compelling publications

© 2024 by Julia Cope

Zubiak Medical Communications

bottom of page